citation_author
Jabłońska-Bonca, Jolanta
citation_volume
11
citation_publication_date
12/2019
citation_title
A Scientist in the Game of Power over Knowledge. In the Light of the Act 2.0
citation_pdf_url
https://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/en/system/files/Jablonska-Bonca_EN.pdf
citation_issue
4
citation_journal_title
Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne studia nad prawem
citation_issn
2080-1084
citation_firstpage
131
citation_lastpage
143
dcterms.title
A Scientist in the Game of Power over Knowledge. In the Light of the Act 2.0
dcterms.creator
Jabłońska-Bonca
dcterms.subject
power over knowledge, scientists’ autonomy, social impact, academic science, industrial science, post-academic science, research funding, academic strategy
dcterms.description
Academics and faculty members are entangled in many interests. Selfless science for cognitive purposes is a thing of the past. There is a constant game of the power over knowledge. Apart from scientists, many entities with various interests are participants of the game. They are: politicians, officials, academic administration, research sponsors, accreditation agencies, publishers, resort scientific institutes, industry, business. The scientists themselves sometimes work for the truth and sometimes they work for profit; they create knowledge which is public property, or when they are employed commercially, e.g. by the industry, they create private knowledge. This paper presents five factors which may contribute to restricting the cognitive autonomy of the scientists.
dcterms.contributor
Jabłońska-Bonca
dcterms.date
12/2019
dcterms.type
Text
dcterms.format
text/html
dcterms.identifier
https://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/en/pub/5845
dcterms.abstract
Academics and faculty members are entangled in many interests. Selfless science for cognitive purposes is a thing of the past. There is a constant game of the power over knowledge. Apart from scientists, many entities with various interests are participants of the game. They are: politicians, officials, academic administration, research sponsors, accreditation agencies, publishers, resort scientific institutes, industry, business. The scientists themselves sometimes work for the truth and sometimes they work for profit; they create knowledge which is public property, or when they are employed commercially, e.g. by the industry, they create private knowledge. This paper presents five factors which may contribute to restricting the cognitive autonomy of the scientists.
dcterms.language
en
dcterms.modified
2021-01-04T01:14+01:00