@article {5065,
	title = {Reflections on the French Council of State{\textquoteright}s Ruling of 26 August 2016 {\textquotedblleft}Banning the {\guillemotright}Burkini{\guillemotleft}{\textquotedblright}},
	journal = {Krytyka Prawa. Niezale{\.z}ne studia nad prawem},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2018},
	month = {2018},
	pages = {144-157},
	abstract = {The article offers an analysis into the French Council of State{\textquoteright}s ruling of 26 August 2016, which suspended a ban {\textendash} imposed by a decision of a mayor of a coastal resort town {\textendash} on wearing the burkini on local beaches. {\textquotedblleft}The burkini issue{\textquotedblright} has been also dealt with in Belgium, which is why the analysis presented in this article and the accompanying reflections serve as a good opportunity to offer a brief comparison of the French and the Belgian specificities of the constitutional form of the relationships between the state and churches, and a range of relevant references to the ECHR{\textquoteright}s judicial decisions concerning the problem of the presence of symbols {\textendash} being manifestations of one{\textquoteright}s beliefs {\textendash} in the public sphere of a democratic state.},
	issn = {2080-1084},
	doi = {10.7206/kp.2080-1084.257}
}
