@article {5832,
	title = {Ochrona praw podatnik{\'o}w w {\'s}wietle orzecznictwa Europejskiego Trybuna{\l}u Praw Cz{\l}owieka w Strasburgu},
	journal = {Krytyka Prawa. Niezale{\.z}ne studia nad prawem},
	volume = {12},
	year = {2020},
	month = {3/2020},
	pages = {132{\textendash}148},
	abstract = {One of the most effective systems of protection of human rights is the system defined in the European Convention of Human Rights. Until 2010, the European Court of Human Rights had rarely handled tax cases because, in principle, it excluded this category of cases from its jurisdiction in the field of the protection of taxpayer rights. Such cases had always been qualified {\textendash} in accordance to the requirements of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights {\textendash} as criminal or civil (property-related) cases. A major change in the ECHR{\textquoteright}s approach to cases featuring tax-related aspects occurred in 2011. Given the protection of the right to property as set out in Protocol No. 1, the ECHR  ranted taxpayers protection related to the return of value added tax in situations in which the taxpayer fulfilled their record-keeping obligations. The adopted trend in the issued decisions is seen to be dominant, but to be considered grounded, a greater number of ECHR judicial decisions than at present is needed. There is no doubt that the new tendency in the judicial decisions issued by the ECHR may have a major impact on the decisions issued by administrative courts in Poland.},
	issn = {2080-1084},
	doi = {10.7206/kp.2080-1084.366}
}
