@article {6127,
	title = {Przeciwdzia{\l}anie unikaniu i uchylaniu si{\k e} od opodatkowania w wybranych dyrektywach z zakresu podatk{\'o}w bezpo{\'s}rednich},
	journal = {Krytyka Prawa. Niezale{\.z}ne studia nad prawem},
	volume = {7},
	year = {2015},
	month = {3/2015},
	pages = {135-156},
	abstract = {The paper entitled {\textquotedblleft}Counteracting Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion in Selected EU Directives on Direct Taxes{\textquotedblright} discusses the provisions of Directive 2003/49/EC, Directive 2009/133/EC and Directive 2011/96/EC that are capable of withdrawing the benefits provided under the directives in the case of tax fraud and abuse, tax evasion or tax avoidance. The paper reviews provisions of the directives and also the case law of the European Court of Justice concerning tax fraud and abuse. The jurisprudence of the ECJ plays a key role in setting standards for regulations on the prevention of tax evasion and avoidance adopted by Member States of the European Union. The paper{\textquoteright}s centre piece argument is that the solution adopted by the EU legislator, which shifted the burden of preventing tax escape from the EU to Member States, is ineffective and falls short of fulfilling its proper role. The paper emphasises that many tax payers take advantage of the fundamental treaty freedoms and applicable directives to obtain tax benefits or double non-taxation. Limitations imposed by a strict jurisprudential approach of the European Court of Justice also pose a significant barrier to effective tackling the negative phenomenon of aggressive tax planning based on EU laws, the paper suggests. By assessing the effects of the application of the existing regulations and juxtaposing them with the current scale of the problem, the author presents an argument for changing the direction of measures taken to curb international tax avoidance and evasion. },
	issn = {2080-1084},
	doi = {10.7206/kp.2080-1084.78}
}
