@article {6605,
	title = {Three minutes of silence: Thinking in duration in organization studies},
	journal = {Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry},
	volume = {6},
	year = {2007},
	month = {2007},
	pages = {159-175},
	abstract = {In this paper I wish to make, or perhaps force a link between three very distinct sets of debates in organization studies. The first concerns the status of {\textquoteright}memory{\textquoteright} in organizational terms, and how to best preserve shared knowledge, as defined by Walsh \& Ungson (1991). The second deals with the repression and expression of emotion in organized settings, as exemplified in the classic work of Arlie Hochschild (2003). The third is a less well known methodological debate about the politics of {\textquoteright}giving voice{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteright}remaining silent{\textquoteright} (Morrison \& Milliken, 2003). At first glance all three debates - concerning memory, emotion, voice - seem to share a common social psychological orientation. But exploring the character of this common thread is not primary what I want to set out to achieve. I wish instead to demonstrate that what is at stake in all three debates is how organization studies {\textquoteright}thinks with{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteright}thinks against{\textquoteright} its participants. I want to propose that what makes for the difference between these two strategies is taking seriously the temporal structuring of human action. To illustrate this claim I will work through an extended example - the use of public collective silence as a commemorative practice.},
	issn = {1532-5555}
}
