@article {6646,
	title = {Ethical discriminations? Representing the Reprehensible},
	journal = {Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry},
	volume = {2},
	year = {2003},
	month = {2003},
	pages = {1-16},
	abstract = {This paper reflects upon the {\textquoteright}goodness{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteright}ethics{\textquoteright} of Critical Management/Critical Organisation Studies (COS) research practices. I argue that academic representations of others entail an ethical responsibility to the researched, a responsibility that COS is, as yet, insufficiently exploring. Reflecting upon my own research with those who have colluded in discrimination and Stanley and Wise{\textquoteright}s (1979) research on obscene telephone callers, I explore the nature and limits of responsibility when researching those who have acted reprehensibly. I end by arguing that COS "owe(s) some responsibility to {\textquoteright}the researched{\textquoteright} of all kinds, whether we morally approve of them or not" (Stanley and Wise 1993:177). },
	issn = {1532-5555}
}
