@article {7043,
	title = {Remote hearings and judicial symbolism.  A draft},
	journal = {Krytyka Prawa. Niezale{\.z}ne Studia nad Prawem},
	volume = {14},
	year = {2022},
	month = {6/2022},
	pages = {235-254},
	abstract = {The purpose of this text is to answer the question of whether and to what extent traditional court symbols and rituals remain (and should remain) present at remote hearings. Some legal symbols have archetypal meaning. Others are born with their era, judged in a particular context. There are many of them in traditional courtrooms. Which remain on computer screen? The author investigates whether and to what extent visual symbols (e.g. elements of architecture, furnishings) are present at remote hearings. Considering courts and online courts (or {\textquoteleft}e-courts{\textquoteright}) as heterotopias (in Michel Foucault{\textquoteright}s sense), she looks deeper into and explores their properties.},
	issn = {2080-1084},
	doi = {10.7206/kp.2080-1084.533}
}
