@article {7181,
	title = {Obowi{\k a}zek syndyka zapoznania si{\k e} z tre{\'s}ci{\k a} przesy{\l}ki pocztowej adresowanej do upad{\l}ego a prawo do prywatno{\'s}ci},
	journal = {Krytyka Prawa. Niezale{\.z}ne Studia nad Prawem},
	volume = {15},
	year = {2023},
	month = {3/2023},
	pages = {249-274},
	abstract = {The publication looks into the conflict that occurs between values protected under the Constitution of the Republic of Poland {\textendash} i.e. the right to privacy and the protection of communication versus the protection of property rights {\textendash} in a situation of declaration of bankruptcy. Acting pursuant to Article 176(2) of the Bankruptcy Law, the legislator has a priori given preference to the protection of property rights over the right to privacy and the protection of communication. The conflict in question has been resolved in favour of bankruptcy creditors. The legislator{\textquoteright}s adoption of a hierarchy of values in the area of bankruptcy law does not, of course, deal with all the problems arising in the field of the conflict between these values, and does not mean that the solution chosen is in accordance with hierarchically higher norms {\textendash} meaning constitutional norms. In principle, the Constitution of the Republic of Poland makes the legislator free to resolve conflicts of competing values protected under this normative act. What is important is that this conflict be resolved by the {\textendash} legislator in a way that meets the requirements of Article 31(3) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland.},
	issn = {2080-1084},
	doi = {10.7206/kp.2080-1084.581}
}
