@article {7232,
	title = {Domniemanie j{\k e}zyka potocznego  jako paradygmat interpretacyjny  i jego wrogowie w polskiej teorii prawa},
	journal = {Krytyka Prawa. Niezale{\.z}ne Studia nad Prawem},
	volume = {15},
	year = {2023},
	month = {6/2023},
	pages = { 310{\textendash}330},
	abstract = {In my paper, I reconstruct Jerzy Wr{\'o}blewski{\textquoteright}s theory of interpretation. My goal is to show that this theory has the characteristics of a paradigmatic theory because of the importance of the presumption of common language, which is a fundamental element of this theory. This presumption is decisive in shaping the picture of interpretation and, consequently, gives the theory in question the status of a model theory defining a postulated model of legal interpretation. In the paper, I discuss various aspects of this presumption, highlighting its importance in preserving the principle of universal access to practical (legal) discourse. At the same time, I question the views that challenge this presumption by claiming that the language of law is a code accessible only to a cognitively privileged group of professional lawyers.},
	issn = {2080-1084},
	doi = {10.7206/kp.2080-1084.609}
}
