@article {6408,
	title = {The Dialectic Storytelling of the Standing Conference for  Management and Organization Inquiry (sc{\textquoteright}MOI ) as it Dismembers  and Re-members},
	journal = {Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry},
	volume = {14},
	year = {2016},
	month = {2016},
	pages = {53-64},
	abstract = {Standing Conference for Management and Organization Inquiry (sc{\textquoteright}Moi) is coming undone, in the process of ending its 25-year conference run, and being dismembered, its members leaving for other conferences. The purpose of my talk is to develop a Hegel and {\v Z}i{\v z}ek understanding of the dialectic of storytelling of sc{\textquoteright}MOI. {\v Z}i{\v z}ek claims that Hegelian dialectics is making a comeback because it is uniquely suited to our time. Unlike the usual erroneous oversimplified formula reading of Hegel (thesis-antithesis- synthesis), I will assert there is no synthesis, Marx rejection of {\textquoteleft}Spirit{\textquoteright} and Adorno{\textquoteright}s turning dialectic into a pursuit of objectivity, leaves us with a shallow dialectics. By reclaiming the {\textquoteleft}Spirit{\textquoteright} in relation to system and science as well as materiality in Hegelian dialect, we have a new way to understand sc{\textquoteright}MOI. Spirit is not about religion, but rather it is the experience of Reason in action and Being. Spirit stands in dialectic relation to the system principles (abstract, schemata), and to system that becomes science. In addition, Spirit{\textquoteright}s relation to system is worked out in space, in time, in mattering, or what Karen Barad calls spacetimemattering. Looking at the history of sc{\textquoteright}MOI, I will claim sc{\textquoteright}MOI never was a whole system, but rather a systemicity of unmerged and unfinalized parts in search of a whole. sc{\textquoteright}MOI is was part of the umbrella conference (International Academy of Business Disciplines) until Boje was beheaded as IABD conference president, and three divisions of IABD jumped ship to start sc{\textquoteright}MOI in 2004, and held its first conference in 2005. From 1993 till 2004, that means sc{\textquoteright}MOI was only a potentiality, a shadowy outline of a conference, not actually coordinating its own location, audiovisuals, meals, coffee, setting its own schedule and business meeting, etc. Even after 2005, sc{\textquoteright}MOI did not get its legs, did not merge its processes, did not sustain economically or socially as a robust alternative to the Academy of Management (AOM) conference, ever its nemesis. As sc{\textquoteright}MOI prepares to dismember its membership and re member its past, sc{\textquoteright}MOI is without beginning, middle, and end. Its Spirit lives on, as do its materials: proceedings, paper presentations, receipts for room rentals and airline seats. sc{\textquoteright}MOI is a movement, an opposition to modernity in its critical postmodernism, to corporate university, to TQM, reengineering, AACSB, to war, to globalization, to humanism in its posthumanism, and to unsustainability. Best to dismember before all of sc{\textquoteright}MOI is unsustainable, its systemicity unraveling, its unfulfilled science, and only the sc{\textquoteright}MOI Spirit actually can live on.},
	issn = {1532-5555}
}
