@article {6797,
	title = {The Mouse is Mightier than the Lion: Should TAMARA be a Science or a Pomo  Poetic Aesthetic?},
	journal = {Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry},
	volume = {1},
	year = {2001},
	month = {2001},
	pages = {84-91},
	abstract = {This discussion piece sets the tone for this new journal in its narrative presentation form. It will run over two issues and is open to include feedback from readers. In debating the case for TAMARA to represent either a) a postmodern science approach to organisational analysis or b) a postmodern aesthetic appreciation, the two participants reflect on the relevance of critical theory to their life and work. Hence rather than the intellectual exchange taking place in a disembodied form, they situate their intellectual history via issues of social location and lived experience. They reflect on the integral connection between theory and practice with the objective of furthering their commitment to effecting social change. The first short article takes the form of initially introducing the authors and then moves to a discussion of the role of critical pedagogy. The detailed references to teaching content are broached in order to demonstrate the efficacy of critical analysis for pedagogical purposes; not to focus on the relative achievement of the individual lecturers involved. The second longer article entails a debate of central relevance to the Journal, addressing: what type of orientation a critical postmodern analysis of organisational politics might take? The discussion begins with a dialogue between the two protagonists on the pros and cons of adopting a scientific approach. The focus then switches to situating the plurality of postmodernism; analysing the {\textquoteleft}affirmative{\textquoteright} versus {\textquoteleft}sceptical{\textquoteright} opposition. The contribution of the {\textquoteleft}White French Pomo Boys{\textquoteright} is interrogated in relation to the late modernist thesis. Finally, Boje proposes an eclectic integration between modernist and postmodernist influences in the name of {\textquoteleft}narrative ethics{\textquoteright}. Bissett responds, outlining the dilemmas of employing unreconstructed narratives. She deconstructs the notion of the aesthetic as a modernist cultural category, in order to propose a postmodern {\textquoteleft}political poetic{\textquoteright} alternative..},
	issn = {1532-5555}
}
