@article {7000,
	title = {Ustawa o~narodzie {\textendash} czy na pewno  jest to ustawa przemy{\'s}lana? To manifest partyjny czy ustawa parlamentarna?},
	journal = {Krytyka Prawa. Niezale{\.z}ne Studia nad Prawem},
	volume = {14},
	year = {2022},
	month = {4/2022},
	pages = {111{\textendash}132},
	abstract = {The author offers an analysis of the controversial Israeli Nation-State Law of 2018 and B. Netanyahu{\textquoteright}s involvement in its adoption. He claims that its ideas manifest Netanyahu{\textquoteright}s desire to depart from the state-centred, social democratic, and liberal views advocated by Ben Gurion. This desire stems from his strong disagreement with Israel{\textquoteright}s founder{\textquoteright}s claim and belief that secularism is a~guarantee that Israel does not fall into the same trap as the leaders of the bicentennial Crusades {\textendash} which ultimately failed. The author of the paper makes an insightful comparison of this law with the contents of Point 13 of Thomas Woodrow Wilson{\textquoteright}s 1918 plan {\textendash} a~docu-ment from exactly 100 years before, designed to shape Europe after victory in the war against Russia, Prussia, and Austria-Hungary, on whose lands an independent Polish state was to be established.},
	issn = {2080-1084},
	doi = {10.7206/kp.2080-1084.511}
}
