@article {7025,
	title = {Critical Effect: Contextualizing Performance in Business Schools using the h-Index},
	journal = {Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry},
	volume = {19},
	year = {2022},
	month = {6/2022},
	pages = {44-63},
	abstract = {Faculty performance assessments increasingly use the h-index. Designed to account for publication quantity and effect, the h-index informs organizational discussions and internal narratives. However, its use in business schools is problematic for two reasons. First, tension exists between the positivist approach of management and the reflexive approach of critical management studies. Second, the use of the h-index is hegemonic, privileging one group and construct over another. Given the power asymmetry between senior and junior faculty, discussions around one{\textquoteright}s h-index could be unavoidable. Using Google Scholar, this study compared the h-index values of those in critical management studies with those in management. Examining these data descriptively revealed that the h-index of those in critical research were greater than those in management at the assistant, associate, and full professor levels. Incorporating these findings, even if skeptical of positivism, is constructive for the advancement and continuation of critical business research.},
	issn = {1532-5555},
	doi = {10.7206/tamara.1532-5555.12}
}
