Publikacja:
Ustawa o narodzie – czy na pewno jest to ustawa przemyślana? To manifest partyjny czy ustawa parlamentarna?
Cytowanie
Uri Huppert. (2022). Ustawa o narodzie – czy na pewno jest to ustawa przemyślana? To manifest partyjny czy ustawa parlamentarna? Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia Nad Prawem, 14(1), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.511
Słowa kluczowe
Izrael ustawa o narodzie z 2018 roku Beniamin Netanjahu świeckie państwo Izraela punkt 13 planu prezydenta Woodrow Wilsona z 1918 roku ignorowanie mniejszości
Abstrakt
The author offers an analysis of the controversial Israeli Nation-State Law of 2018 and B. Netanyahu’s involvement in its adoption. He claims that its ideas manifest Netanyahu’s desire to depart from the state-centred, social democratic, and liberal views advocated by Ben Gurion. This desire stems from his strong disagreement with Israel’s founder’s claim and belief that secularism is a guarantee that Israel does not fall into the same trap as the leaders of the bicentennial Crusades – which ultimately failed. The author of the paper makes an insightful comparison of this law with the contents of Point 13 of Thomas Woodrow Wilson’s 1918 plan – a docu-ment from exactly 100 years before, designed to shape Europe after victory in the war against Russia, Prussia, and Austria-Hungary, on whose lands an independent Polish state was to be established.
