Publikacja:

Campus Bitch & White Trash: Pardoning the Injury of Language Acts in Participatory Contexts

Data

2003
Artykuł
w:Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry
Przeglądaj czasopismo
Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry
Rocznik 2003Wydanie 3Numer 2
Przeglądaj numer
Ładowanie...
Miniatura

Pliki

Pobierz
Nazwa pliku 199-736-1-PB.pdf
Rozmiar:815.01 KB
Licencja
CC-BY-4.0

Autorzy

Sanjiv Dugal Department of Management College of Business Administration University of Rhode Island
Matthew Eriksen Leadership Institute, Office of Traning and Quality Performance, Department of Home Security, USA
Kathleen Mallon Strategic Planning and Institutional Research, University of Rhode Island, USA
Matthew Roy Charlton College of Business, University of Massachusetts, USA

Czasopismo

Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry

Cytowanie

Sanjiv Dugal, Matthew Eriksen, Kathleen Mallon, & Matthew Roy. (2003). Campus Bitch & White Trash: Pardoning the Injury of Language Acts in Participatory Contexts. Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 2(3), 36–45. https://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/3078

Słowa kluczowe

work environment violence in the workplace bullying in the workplace employee crimes verbal behavior

Abstrakt

Campus Bitch and White Trash are the kind of appellations that can draw one into the dark heart of a world where words wound, images enrage, and speech is haunted by hate. One need look only as far as the latest outbreak of violence in the workplace or on the schoolyard to find examples of how name-calling and bullying can erupt in rage. The issue of injurious speech and our vulnerability to words is a critical management issue. In her book Excitable Speech, a politics of the performative, Judith Butler raises the questions: What establishes the performative character of injurious labels? And what makes the force of an utterance injurious? Our vulnerability to words is a consequence of our being constituted by them. As linguistic beings we have to use words to form reason. We cannot create meaning without structuring our thoughts and feelings with words. According to Althusser, ideology hails or interpolates or concretizes individuals as subjects according to the functioning of the category of the subject (1971, 162). Thus we are called upon by our names. Being called a name is one of the examples Althusser uses to explain "interpolation." When an ideology hails us, it alters who we are, and, so the argument goes, we recognize who or what we have become.

Statystyki

33 od daty umieszczenia 2025-07-25
5ostatni miesiąc
2ostatni tydzień
Data pozyskania: 2026-02-26
9 od daty umieszczenia 2025-07-25
3ostatni miesiąc
1ostatni tydzień
Data pozyskania: 2026-02-26

Statystyki

33 od daty umieszczenia 2025-07-25
5ostatni miesiąc
2ostatni tydzień
Data pozyskania: 2026-02-26
9 od daty umieszczenia 2025-07-25
3ostatni miesiąc
1ostatni tydzień
Data pozyskania: 2026-02-26