Publikacja:

Varieties of Legal Probabilism: A Survey

Data

2018
Artykuł
Przeszukaj czasopismo Uproszczony widok Pełne metadane Statystyki
 
cris.legacyid4993
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalancec5e604c2-f6bd-4f19-914c-e01c8ff3c6c3
dc.abstract.plLegal Probabilism is the view that mathematics, and probability theory in particular, can be used to explicate the standard of legal decisions. While probabilistic tools are sometimes used in courtrooms, the construction of a general model of evidence evaluation remains a challenge. Conceptual difficulties facing Legal Probabilism include the difficulty about conjunction, the difficulty about corroboration and the gatecrasher paradox. These problems need to be addressed before we construct a general model. In this survey we discuss the three difficulties and present some theories proposed as their solutions.Małgorzata Stefaniak, Rafał Urbaniak
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Gdansk
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Gdansk
dc.contributor.authorMałgorzata Stefaniak
dc.contributor.authorRafał Urbaniak
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-28T14:24:20Z
dc.date.available2025-07-28T14:24:20Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.published2018
dc.description.issue30
dc.description.physical33-52
dc.identifier.doi10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.112
dc.identifier.issn1733-0092
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/3602
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofCollective and Individual Decisions
dc.relation.pages33-52
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
dc.subjectlegal probabilism
dc.subjectBayesian epistemology
dc.subjectlegal decision standards
dc.title

Varieties of Legal Probabilism: A Survey

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication