Some problems with judging rationality

cris.legacyid	5974
cris.virtual.journalance	#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalance	c5e604c2-f6bd-4f19-914c-e01c8ff3c6c3
dc.abstract.pl	The gap between game-theoretic predictions and actual choices people make in, for instance, gaming experiments has been over-interpreted as evidence against rationality of players. I consider a version of the ultimatum game and examine its equilibria under different assumptions about players’ preferences. Using standard notions of rationality I show that the discrepancy between the “normative” and the “descriptive” cannot be established by a simple comparison of what is predicted by the equilibrium choices and the actual choices
dc.contributor.affiliation	University of Maryland
dc.contributor.author	Piotr Swistak
dc.date.accessioned	2025-07-28T14:25:55Z
dc.date.available	2025-07-28T14:25:55Z
dc.date.issued	2015
dc.date.published	6/2015
dc.description.issue	23
dc.description.physical	5-22
dc.identifier.doi	10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.44
dc.identifier.issn	1733-0092
dc.identifier.uri	https://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/3675
dc.language	en
dc.relation.ispartof	Collective and Individual Decisions
dc.relation.pages	5-22
dc.rights	CC-BY-4.0
dc.subject	teoria gier
dc.subject	behawioralna teoria gier
dc.subject	gra ultimatum
dc.subject	racjonalność
dc.subtype	Original
dc.title	Some problems with judging rationality
dc.type	Article
dspace.entity.type	Publication

Data