Publikacja:

On Two Types Of Randomization In Distributive Decisions

Data

2019
Artykuł
 
cris.legacyid5786
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalancec5e604c2-f6bd-4f19-914c-e01c8ff3c6c3
dc.abstract.plThe purpose of the article is to provide a comparative analysis of two types of randomization – egalitarian and proportional – in distributive decisions, with a view to determining conditions in which they can be applied. It is argued in the article that justice reasons in favour of egalitarian randomization should be construed broadly (as embracing not only the situation of indifference – the equal satisfaction of a given criterion, but also the situations of the lack of criteria or their incommensurability), and that they are stronger than utilitarian reasons. It is also argued that the confl ict between justice ex ante and justice ex post may take an acute form only in the case of proportional randomization, which is why this type of randomization can be applied relatively rarely – only in two situations: if the distribution is repeatedly made and/or if the differences between claims of the candidates (for a good/burden being distributed) are not substantial. Some other differences are also pointed out in the article, e.g., that while proportional randomization must always be statistical, egalitarian randomization may be at times epistemic. It is also argued that in some circumstances (e.g., in the context of the so called Number Problem) doubts may arise as to which type of randomization should be applied, and the applications of both types may prove to be equivalent.
dc.contributor.affiliationUniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie
dc.contributor.authorWojciech Załuski
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-28T14:24:38Z
dc.date.available2025-07-28T14:24:38Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.date.published6/2019
dc.description.issue31
dc.description.physical29-56
dc.identifier.doi10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.120
dc.identifier.issn1733-0092
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/3616
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofCollective and Individual Decisions
dc.relation.pages29-56
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.subjectsprawiedliwość
dc.subjectracje normatywne
dc.subjectracje psychologiczne
dc.subjectrandomizacja egalitarna
dc.subjectrandomizacja proporcjonalna
dc.subjectutylitaryzm
dc.subjectthe Number Problem
dc.subtypeOriginal
dc.title

On Two Types Of Randomization In Distributive Decisions

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication