Publikacja:

Czy powrót ustawowego bezprawia?

Data

2022
Artykuł
 
cris.legacyid7125
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalanceff6de15c-793d-460a-a16f-745170980ddb
dc.abstract.plConstitutional crisis confronts legal practice with philosophical problems that normally may seem abstract or even purely academic. Among those, there is a question of material (content-dependent) criteria of legal validity, namely whether legal norms may actually have any content and remain binding elements of the law. It becomes palpable due to the legislative initiatives to decriminalize some violations of law committed by governmental officials. Such regulation deserves discussion in the light of theoretical conceptions of the claim to correctness (justice, righteousness) as a necessary feature of each act of enacting or applying the law. Arguably, even weaker conception of such claim, relying on the correctness relative to the public morality reflected in the fundamental values and principles of the positive law, is sufficient to challenge the potential presumption of validity of such decriminalizing provisions entailed by their possible formally accurate enactment.
dc.contributor.affiliationUniwersytet Śląski
dc.contributor.authorTomasz Pietrzykowski
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T16:29:35Z
dc.date.available2025-07-25T16:29:35Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.published12/2022
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.physical29–44
dc.description.volume14
dc.identifier.doi10.7206/kp.2080-1084.555
dc.identifier.issn2080-1084
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/2569
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofKrytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem
dc.relation.pages29–44
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.subjectprawo
dc.subjectbezkarność
dc.subjectroszczenie do słusznosci
dc.subjectkryzys konstytucyjny
dc.subtypeOriginal
dc.title

Czy powrót ustawowego bezprawia?

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication