Publikacja:

Three Models of Judicial Free Speech and Technological Challenges

Data

2022
Artykuł
Przeszukaj czasopismo Uproszczony widok Pełne metadane Statystyki
 
cris.legacyid7130
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalanceff6de15c-793d-460a-a16f-745170980ddb
dc.abstract.plThe article deals with the normative patterns of communication of judges in a theoretical perspective. Their identification is thus taken as a universal problem, occurring in all legal cultures and regardless of current disputes concerning them. It is assumed that normative patterns of communication among judges are built on the understanding of the role of the judge and the place of the judiciary within checks and balances. Based on the assumption that the role of judges and the status of the judiciary have evolved, three successive historical models of judicial communication were proposed, i.e. the first model – impersonal, the second – self restrained, and the third – accurate communication. The thesis was also put forward that the last of the models may prove to be inadequate in the face of contemporary challenges, resulting primarily from cultural changes driven by the development of new communication technologies.
dc.contributor.affiliationUniwersytet Warszawski
dc.contributor.authorPaweł Skuczyński
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T16:29:41Z
dc.date.available2025-07-25T16:29:41Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.volume14
dc.identifier.doi10.7206/kp.2080-1084.560
dc.identifier.issn2080-1084
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/2574
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofKrytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.subjectsedziowie
dc.subjectkomunikacja
dc.subjectnowe technologie
dc.subtypeOriginal
dc.title

Three Models of Judicial Free Speech and Technological Challenges

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication