Publikacja:

Rankings revisited

Data

2018
Artykuł
Przeszukaj czasopismo Uproszczony widok Pełne metadane Statystyki
 
cris.legacyid4996
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalancec5e604c2-f6bd-4f19-914c-e01c8ff3c6c3
dc.abstract.plWe argue that rankings, as they are commonly used, can be, and perhaps are, misleading and potentially harmful. With little extra effort, however, one can gain much more insight into relations among the objects ranked and, in the consequence, gain a better understanding of the ranking. The fundamental notion used to compare and evaluate rankings in our analysis is that of Pareto optymality. General claims are illustrated with the ranking of Polish universities published by Perspektywy monthly in 2016. This note is based on results that are well known in the areas of multiobjective optimization and multiple-criteria decision analysis. The objective of the note is to point to the shortcomings and potential pitfalls behind the common use and understanding of rankings
dc.contributor.affiliationPolish Academy of Sciences
dc.contributor.authorIgnacy Kaliszewski
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-28T14:24:24Z
dc.date.available2025-07-28T14:24:24Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.date.published2018
dc.description.issue30
dc.description.physical75-84
dc.identifier.doi10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.115
dc.identifier.issn1733-0092
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/3605
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofCollective and Individual Decisions
dc.relation.pages75-84
dc.rightsCC-BY-NC-ND-4.0
dc.subjectrankings
dc.subjectdominance
dc.subjectincomparability
dc.subjectsubjectivity
dc.title

Rankings revisited

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication