Publikacja:

The Dialectic Storytelling of the Standing Conference for Management and Organization Inquiry (sc’MOI ) as it Dismembers and Re-members

Data

2016
Artykuł
w:Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry
Przeglądaj czasopismo
Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry
Rocznik 2016Wydanie 1Numer 14
Przeglądaj numer
Ładowanie...
Miniatura

Pliki

Pobierz
Nazwa pliku 414-1477-1-PB.pdf
Rozmiar:791.01 KB
Licencja
CC-BY-4.0

Autorzy

David M. Boje New Mexico State University

Czasopismo

Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry

Cytowanie

David M. Boje. (2016). The Dialectic Storytelling of the Standing Conference for Management and Organization Inquiry (sc’MOI ) as it Dismembers and Re-members. Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 14(1), 53–64. https://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/2841

Słowa kluczowe

sc’moi conference storytelling death

Abstrakt

Standing Conference for Management and Organization Inquiry (sc’Moi) is coming undone, in the process of ending its 25-year conference run, and being dismembered, its members leaving for other conferences. The purpose of my talk is to develop a Hegel and Žižek understanding of the dialectic of storytelling of sc’MOI. Žižek claims that Hegelian dialectics is making a comeback because it is uniquely suited to our time. Unlike the usual erroneous oversimplified formula reading of Hegel (thesis-antithesis- synthesis), I will assert there is no synthesis, Marx rejection of ‘Spirit’ and Adorno’s turning dialectic into a pursuit of objectivity, leaves us with a shallow dialectics. By reclaiming the ‘Spirit’ in relation to system and science as well as materiality in Hegelian dialect, we have a new way to understand sc’MOI. Spirit is not about religion, but rather it is the experience of Reason in action and Being. Spirit stands in dialectic relation to the system principles (abstract, schemata), and to system that becomes science. In addition, Spirit’s relation to system is worked out in space, in time, in mattering, or what Karen Barad calls spacetimemattering. Looking at the history of sc’MOI, I will claim sc’MOI never was a whole system, but rather a systemicity of unmerged and unfinalized parts in search of a whole. sc’MOI is was part of the umbrella conference (International Academy of Business Disciplines) until Boje was beheaded as IABD conference president, and three divisions of IABD jumped ship to start sc’MOI in 2004, and held its first conference in 2005. From 1993 till 2004, that means sc’MOI was only a potentiality, a shadowy outline of a conference, not actually coordinating its own location, audiovisuals, meals, coffee, setting its own schedule and business meeting, etc. Even after 2005, sc’MOI did not get its legs, did not merge its processes, did not sustain economically or socially as a robust alternative to the Academy of Management (AOM) conference, ever its nemesis. As sc’MOI prepares to dismember its membership and re member its past, sc’MOI is without beginning, middle, and end. Its Spirit lives on, as do its materials: proceedings, paper presentations, receipts for room rentals and airline seats. sc’MOI is a movement, an opposition to modernity in its critical postmodernism, to corporate university, to TQM, reengineering, AACSB, to war, to globalization, to humanism in its posthumanism, and to unsustainability. Best to dismember before all of sc’MOI is unsustainable, its systemicity unraveling, its unfulfilled science, and only the sc’MOI Spirit actually can live on.

Statystyki

20 od daty umieszczenia 2025-07-25
1ostatni miesiąc
Data pozyskania: 2026-02-27
11 od daty umieszczenia 2025-07-25
4ostatni miesiąc
3ostatni tydzień
Data pozyskania: 2026-02-27

Statystyki

20 od daty umieszczenia 2025-07-25
1ostatni miesiąc
Data pozyskania: 2026-02-27
11 od daty umieszczenia 2025-07-25
4ostatni miesiąc
3ostatni tydzień
Data pozyskania: 2026-02-27