Publikacja:

Publikacje w czasopismach naukowych – nowa odsłona nieuczciwości

Data

2022
Artykuł
 
cris.legacyid7122
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalanceff6de15c-793d-460a-a16f-745170980ddb
dc.abstract.plThe review process of texts submitted for publication in scientific journals is one of the main ways of evaluating the scientific output of their authors. Any disruptions in this process can have serious and far-reaching consequences, not only in terms of the credibility and integrity of the author themselves, but – most importantly – in terms of the confidence in their achievements. Attempts to distort the review process have so far occurred most often in medical and exact sciences. The case of „The Critique of Law” discussed herein shows that attempts at scientific fraud affect also legal sciences. The purpose of the article is to inform the scientific community worldwide about subsequent attempts of unethical scholarly activities, to describe instances of malpractice, and to point out some of the possible ways to prevent the fraud in question.
dc.contributor.affiliationAkademia Leona Koźmińskiego
dc.contributor.authorMałgorzata Skórzewska-Amberg
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T16:29:32Z
dc.date.available2025-07-25T16:29:32Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.published12/2022
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.physical10-19
dc.description.volume14
dc.identifier.doi10.7206/kp.2080-1084.552
dc.identifier.issn2080-1084
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/2566
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofKrytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem
dc.relation.pages10-19
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.subjectoszustwo naukowe
dc.subjectfałszywy recenzent
dc.subjectfałszywy prces recenzyjny
dc.subjectfałszywy autor
dc.subjectpapiernia
dc.subtypeOriginal
dc.title

Publikacje w czasopismach naukowych – nowa odsłona nieuczciwości

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication