Hyperion Commentary, Tamara Organizing: Reply to Krizanc

cris.legacyid	6704
cris.virtual.journalance	#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalance	648ce774-05ae-47f3-8a1b-62524c23badd
dc.abstract.pl	This is a reply to an essay that John Krizanc sent to me. Krizanc (1989) is also the author of the Tamara play. I have applied Tamara to organizing (Boje, 1995). Here I want to look at some of the consequences of interactive organizing that is theorized as a postmodern narrative. Producers and consumers meet in the narrative space we call 'organizing.' As Roland Barthes (1970) put it, “the goal of a literary work is to make the reader no longer a consumer but a producer of the text” (S/Z). In questioning the position of the narrative in relation to the producer and consumer of organizing, this essay challenges the role of consumer sovereignty that makes consumers the sole authors of organizing.
dc.contributor.affiliation	New Mexico State University
dc.contributor.author	David Boje
dc.date.accessioned	2025-07-25T16:47:47Z
dc.date.available	2025-07-25T16:47:47Z
dc.date.issued	2006
dc.date.published	2006
dc.description.issue	3
dc.description.physical	81-85
dc.description.volume	5
dc.identifier.issn	1532-5555
dc.identifier.uri	https://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/3109
dc.language	en
dc.relation.ispartof	Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry
dc.relation.pages	81-85
dc.rights	CC-BY-4.0
dc.subtype	Original
dc.title	Hyperion Commentary, Tamara Organizing: Reply to Krizanc
dc.type	Article
dspace.entity.type	Publication

Data