Publikacja:
Strategy and Paradoxes of Borda Count in Formula 1 Racing
Data
2019
Artykuł
Przeszukaj czasopismo| cris.legacyid | 5790 |
| cris.virtual.journalance | #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# |
| cris.virtualsource.journalance | c5e604c2-f6bd-4f19-914c-e01c8ff3c6c3 |
| dc.abstract.pl | Winning a championship is the highest achievement in Formula 1, and multiple titles can earn one a place in the pantheon of the sport. In this article I explore whether the scoring method for selecting a champion can be considered defi nitive, and how unstable results might be when the method’s parameters are slightly changed. I have employed case studies of paradoxes and historical recreations of seasons using alternative scoring systems. Finally, I argue that the Borda count is desirable system for scoring in Formula 1, and that building strategies by teams around particular scoring systems is a legitimate aspect of the sport. |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | University of California |
| dc.contributor.author | Brian Kaiser |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-28T14:24:43Z |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-28T14:24:43Z |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 |
| dc.date.published | 6/2019 |
| dc.description.issue | 31 |
| dc.description.physical | 115-132 |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.124 |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1733-0092 |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/3620 |
| dc.language | en |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Collective and Individual Decisions |
| dc.relation.pages | 115-132 |
| dc.rights | CC-BY-4.0 |
| dc.subject | preferencje |
| dc.subject | metoda bordy |
| dc.subject | paradoksy głosowania |
| dc.subject | teoria wyboru społecznego |
| dc.subject | Formuła 1 |
| dc.subtype | Original |
| dc.title | Strategy and Paradoxes of Borda Count in Formula 1 Racing |
| dc.type | Article |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |