Publikacja:

The Complexification of Work-Family Conflict Theory: A Critical Analysis

Data

2005
Artykuł
Przeszukaj czasopismo Uproszczony widok Pełne metadane Statystyki
 
cris.legacyid6591
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalance648ce774-05ae-47f3-8a1b-62524c23badd
dc.abstract.plThis paper provides an extensive review and categorization of the work-family conflict literature, followed by a discussion of paradigmatic assumptions found within that literature and critical recommendations. The article describes the five most widely utilized theories in the work-family conflict literature: conflict theory, spillover theory, gender role theories, identity theory, and role theory. It concludes by recommending that future research focus on becoming more complex by moving from simple to complex explanations focusing less on hierarchy definitions and more on interactions, less on accounting for singular causality and more on multiple (sometime indeterminate) causalities, use less determinant and more indeterminate language, and adopt a morphogenic view of change.
dc.contributor.affiliationUtah Valley State College
dc.contributor.affiliationUtah Valley State College
dc.contributor.authorSusan R. Madsen
dc.contributor.authorScott C. Hammond
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T16:46:05Z
dc.date.available2025-07-25T16:46:05Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.published2005
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.physical151-179
dc.description.volume4
dc.identifier.issn1532-5555
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/3022
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofTamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry
dc.relation.pages151-179
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.subtypeOriginal
dc.title

The Complexification of Work-Family Conflict Theory: A Critical Analysis

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication