Publikacja:

Does the relationship between sustainable human resource management and organizational identification vary by culture? Evidence from 35 countries based on GLOBE framework

Data

2025
Artykuł
 
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalancedc92c553-0411-4522-97d5-b7ef33169392
dc.abstract.enThe article discusses the relationships between sustainable HRM and organizational identification, conceptualized at the individual level, and the moderating role of cultural dimensions conceptualized at the country level (described in GLOBE’s framework). The study’s theoretical model based on social exchange theory proposes that sustainable HRM practice increases organizational identification. However, the strength of this identification depends on the dimensions of national culture. Thus, we assumed national culture functions as a second-level moderator in the relationship between sustainable HRM and organizational identification. Design/methodology/approach We conducted the study with data from 10,421 employees across 35 countries. We used a multilevel modeling approach for data analysis. Findings The study revealed the cross-level interaction effects of national culture on the relationship between sustainable HRM practice and organizational identification. Specifically, the results indicate that sustainable HRM strengthens employees’ organizational identification more in cultures with higher levels of gender egalitarianism and lower levels of humane orientation. Originality/value This study demonstrates that the relationship between sustainable HRM practices and employees’ organizational identification is culturally sensitive. It highlights the need to consider cultural context when assessing the impact of sustainable HRM practices on employee outcomes. Furthermore, it shows that certain cultural dimensions can enhance the effect of sustainable HRM practices.
dc.abstract.plThe article discusses the relationships between sustainable HRM and organizational identification, conceptualized at the individual level, and the moderating role of cultural dimensions conceptualized at the country level (described in GLOBE’s framework). The study’s theoretical model based on social exchange theory proposes that sustainable HRM practice increases organizational identification. However, the strength of this identification depends on the dimensions of national culture. Thus, we assumed national culture functions as a second-level moderator in the relationship between sustainable HRM and organizational identification. Design/methodology/approach We conducted the study with data from 10,421 employees across 35 countries. We used a multilevel modeling approach for data analysis. Findings The study revealed the cross-level interaction effects of national culture on the relationship between sustainable HRM practice and organizational identification. Specifically, the results indicate that sustainable HRM strengthens employees’ organizational identification more in cultures with higher levels of gender egalitarianism and lower levels of humane orientation. Originality/value This study demonstrates that the relationship between sustainable HRM practices and employees’ organizational identification is culturally sensitive. It highlights the need to consider cultural context when assessing the impact of sustainable HRM practices on employee outcomes. Furthermore, it shows that certain cultural dimensions can enhance the effect of sustainable HRM practices.
dc.contributor.authorDariusz Turek
dc.contributor.authorAgnieszka Wojtczuk-Turek
dc.contributor.authorFiona Edgar
dc.contributor.authorNataliya Podgorodnichenko
dc.contributor.authorBelgin Okay-Somerville
dc.contributor.authorNa Fu
dc.contributor.authorAnna Lupina-Wegener
dc.contributor.authorHoward J. Klein
dc.contributor.authorGulcin Akbas
dc.contributor.authorBassam Samir Al-Romeedy
dc.contributor.authorEleni Apospori
dc.contributor.authorJanine Bosak
dc.contributor.authorAdriana Caldana
dc.contributor.authorEleonora Crapolicchio
dc.contributor.authorJennifer Chavanovanich
dc.contributor.authorGuillaume Desjardins
dc.contributor.authorAngela Dorrough
dc.contributor.authorPatrick Dunlop
dc.contributor.authorDivina Edralin
dc.contributor.authorArum Etikariena
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-20T11:50:22Z
dc.date.available2025-11-20T11:50:22Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.date.published2025
dc.description.abstractPurpose The article discusses the relationships between sustainable HRM and organizational identification, conceptualized at the individual level, and the moderating role of cultural dimensions conceptualized at the country level (described in GLOBE’s framework). The study’s theoretical model based on social exchange theory proposes that sustainable HRM practice increases organizational identification. However, the strength of this identification depends on the dimensions of national culture. Thus, we assumed national culture functions as a second-level moderator in the relationship between sustainable HRM and organizational identification. Design/methodology/approach We conducted the study with data from 10,421 employees across 35 countries. We used a multilevel modeling approach for data analysis. Findings The study revealed the cross-level interaction effects of national culture on the relationship between sustainable HRM practice and organizational identification. Specifically, the results indicate that sustainable HRM strengthens employees’ organizational identification more in cultures with higher levels of gender egalitarianism and lower levels of humane orientation. Originality/value This study demonstrates that the relationship between sustainable HRM practices and employees’ organizational identification is culturally sensitive. It highlights the need to consider cultural context when assessing the impact of sustainable HRM practices on employee outcomes. Furthermore, it shows that certain cultural dimensions can enhance the effect of sustainable HRM practices.
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.versionVoR
dc.description.volume33
dc.identifier.affiliationWarsaw School of Economics. Poland
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.affiliation#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/CEMJ-04-2024-0121
dc.identifier.eissn2658-2430
dc.identifier.issn2658-0845
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0084-3396
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.orcid#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/3800
dc.languageen
dc.pbn.affiliationmanagement and quality studies
dc.publisherKozminski University
dc.relation.ispartofCentral European Management Journal
dc.relation.issn2658-0845
dc.relation.issn2658-2430
dc.relation.pages667–696
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.subject.enSustainable HRM practices
dc.subject.enNational culture
dc.subject.enOrganizational identification
dc.subject.plSustainable HRM practices
dc.subject.plNational culture
dc.subject.plOrganizational identification
dc.subtypeOriginal
dc.title

Does the relationship between sustainable human resource management and organizational identification vary by culture? Evidence from 35 countries based on GLOBE framework

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.volume33