Publikacja:

By Any Means Necessary? Ethnographic Access, Ethics and the Critical Researcher

Data

2009
Artykuł
 
cris.legacyid6502
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalance648ce774-05ae-47f3-8a1b-62524c23badd
dc.abstract.plThis paper aims to analyse the implications of negotiating ethnographic research access following research ethical codes and remain coherent with Critical Management Studies (CMS) principles. Through this reflective account, we seek to address the field of Organisation Studies (OS), where ethnographic research access has attracted little theoretical scholarly attention, and also to contribute to the renewed focus on ethical research practice within CMS literature. In addition, we also aim to contribute to broader debates about qualitative research practices by highlighting the ethical implications of establishing formal research access and to analyse the dilemmas that arise from the conflict between prescriptive ethical codes and researcher’s own conscience when carrying out field research. Rather than calling for a new, revised code of ethics, we appeal for a more open and honest debate about the pragmatic realities of critical, organisational ethnographic research.
dc.contributor.affiliationEAESP-FGV
dc.contributor.affiliationManchester Business School
dc.contributor.authorRafael Alcadipani
dc.contributor.authorDamian Hodgson
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T16:44:22Z
dc.date.available2025-07-25T16:44:22Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.published2009
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.physical127-146
dc.description.volume7
dc.identifier.issn1532-5555
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/2933
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofTamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry
dc.relation.pages127-146
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.subtypeOriginal
dc.title

By Any Means Necessary? Ethnographic Access, Ethics and the Critical Researcher

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication