Publikacja:

Where Disciplines Meet

Data

2020
Artykuł
 
cris.legacyid5735
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalanceff6de15c-793d-460a-a16f-745170980ddb
dc.abstract.plAs we are nearing the end of the first 25 years of the 21st century. What is increasingly noticeable is the growing dysfunction and pathology of big systems and of their elements, including – given the omnipresent interrelations and interdependencies – entire masses of smaller entities, together with micro- and family businesses. The author asks a question of whether it could be reasonable to consider returning to some of the assumptions, instruments, and methods adopted within the framework of the systems approach from the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, which was originally conceived and created to treat big systems. Do the achievements made in the field of research in recent decades make it possible to bridge the cognitive gaps that determined the failure of the systems approach in the past century? These gaps are mainly the social mechanisms of functioning of organised systems. There is absolutely no doubt that we have seen huge progress in this domain, mostly thanks to interdisciplinary research and research conducted in recently-emergent “hybrid” disciplines like economic or organisational sociology and psychology, sociology and psychology of management, behavioural economics, behavioural finance, contemporary political economics, but also hybrid legal sciences such as: economics, sociology, and politics of law, political sciences and strategic analyses. The author argues that we need an attempt of a certain reactivation of the systems approach in the context of diagnostics and treatment, meaning a redesign of entire organisational systems– or dynamic connections in a networked structure, actually. It is necessary to modify the classical procedure of systems analysis and adapt it to the specific nature of the changeable networked structures of the 21st century.
dc.contributor.affiliationKozminski University
dc.contributor.authorAndrzej K. Koźmiński
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T16:21:45Z
dc.date.available2025-07-25T16:21:45Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.published07.2020
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.physical9-19
dc.description.volume12
dc.identifier.doi10.7206/kp.2080-1084.377
dc.identifier.issn2080-1084
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/2118
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofKrytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem
dc.relation.pages9-19
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.subjectpodejście systemowe
dc.subjectanaliza systemowa
dc.subjectinterdyscyplinarność
dc.subjectpodejście diagnostyczne
dc.subjectteoria systemów
dc.subjectdyscypliny
dc.subtypeOriginal
dc.title

Where Disciplines Meet

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication