Publikacja:

The Concept of Nomos – Some Remarks

Data

2020
Artykuł
 
cris.legacyid5816
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalanceff6de15c-793d-460a-a16f-745170980ddb
dc.abstract.plIt is a widespread opinion that modern jurisprudence was shaped first of all by the tradition of Roman law. In this article author tries to explain why ancient Greek legal thought should be equally important. As an example he considers the evolution and the different meanings of the concept of nomos. Four issues are presented in this paper. First, nomos in the political philosophy of Carl Schmitt and Giorgio Agamben. Secondly, nomos in one of Pindar’s poems. Thirdly, the distinction between physis and nomos made by the sophists. Fourthly, thesmos, nomos and psephisma in the legislative practice of Athenian ekklesia.
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Gdansk
dc.contributor.authorJerzy Zajadło
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T16:22:10Z
dc.date.available2025-07-25T16:22:10Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.published11/2020
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.physical143-161
dc.description.volume12
dc.identifier.doi10.7206/kp.2080-1084.400
dc.identifier.issn2080-1084
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/2141
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofKrytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem
dc.relation.pages143-161
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.subjectstarożytna Grecja
dc.subjectnomos
dc.subjectpolityka
dc.subjectGiorgio Agamben
dc.subjectCarl Schmitt
dc.subtypeOriginal
dc.title

The Concept of Nomos – Some Remarks

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication