Publikacja:

Próba oceny prawnokarnych skutków fałszywych wyjaśnień na tle prawa do obrony

Data

2020
Artykuł
Przeszukaj czasopismo Uproszczony widok Pełne metadane Statystyki
 
cris.legacyid5837
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalanceff6de15c-793d-460a-a16f-745170980ddb
dc.abstract.plThe paper deals with the issue of the legal consequences of a false statement given by the accused in criminal proceedings. The author presents positions expressed in this matter in the literature and jurisprudence. He then presents and justifies his own view. He believes that a false statement by the accused is not criminally prohibited, because there is no such type of offence. However, such behaviour is unlawful. It is true that this is a kind of defence, but it is not the execution of the right to defence. Nevertheless, it does not appear that the false statement could result in an intensification of the penalty or in the use of a preventive measure in the proceedings (for example temporary custody). It is undoubted, however, that false statement resulting in defamation or false accusation may lead to criminal liability.
dc.contributor.affiliationUniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie, Wydział Prawa i Administracji
dc.contributor.authorMarek Kulik
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T16:22:33Z
dc.date.available2025-07-25T16:22:33Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.date.published3/2020
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.physical229-246
dc.description.volume12
dc.identifier.doi10.7206/kp.2080-1084.371
dc.identifier.issn2080-1084
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/2160
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofKrytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem
dc.relation.pages229-246
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.subjectfałszywe wyjaśnienia
dc.subjectprawo do kłamstwa
dc.subjectprawo do obrony
dc.subtypeOriginal
dc.title

Próba oceny prawnokarnych skutków fałszywych wyjaśnień na tle prawa do obrony

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication