Publikacja:
Ethical discriminations? Representing the Reprehensible
Data
2003
Artykuł
Przeszukaj czasopismo| cris.legacyid | 6646 |
| cris.virtual.journalance | #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# |
| cris.virtualsource.journalance | 648ce774-05ae-47f3-8a1b-62524c23badd |
| dc.abstract.pl | This paper reflects upon the 'goodness' or 'ethics' of Critical Management/Critical Organisation Studies (COS) research practices. I argue that academic representations of others entail an ethical responsibility to the researched, a responsibility that COS is, as yet, insufficiently exploring. Reflecting upon my own research with those who have colluded in discrimination and Stanley and Wise's (1979) research on obscene telephone callers, I explore the nature and limits of responsibility when researching those who have acted reprehensibly. I end by arguing that COS "owe(s) some responsibility to 'the researched' of all kinds, whether we morally approve of them or not" (Stanley and Wise 1993:177). |
| dc.contributor.affiliation | School of Management, University of Salford, UK |
| dc.contributor.author | Edward Wray-Bliss |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-25T16:47:09Z |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-25T16:47:09Z |
| dc.date.issued | 2003 |
| dc.date.published | 2003 |
| dc.description.issue | 3 |
| dc.description.physical | 1-16 |
| dc.description.volume | 2 |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1532-5555 |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/3077 |
| dc.language | en |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry |
| dc.relation.pages | 1-16 |
| dc.rights | CC-BY-4.0 |
| dc.subject | management |
| dc.subject | organization |
| dc.subject | research |
| dc.subject | telephone |
| dc.subject | discrimination |
| dc.subject | ethics |
| dc.subtype | Original |
| dc.title | Ethical discriminations? Representing the Reprehensible |
| dc.type | Article |
| dspace.entity.type | Publication |