Publikacja:

Glosa do wyroku NSA z dnia 20 lutego 2020 r., II GSK 3744/172

Data

2021
Artykuł
 
cris.legacyid6973
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalanceff6de15c-793d-460a-a16f-745170980ddb
dc.abstract.plThe consequence of establishing a health resort is the special rigour of protecting the territory covered by it. The rigour consists i.a. in a ban on mining mineral resources other than natural medical resources, engaging in land development or other works that influence water relations as well as engaging in activities that have a negative influence on the physiography of the health resort. The facts of the case lead to a conclusion that it also does not concern the inside of the earth’s crust ‘under’ the health resort. The dispute as the subject of the judgement voted on concern mining hard coal from a deposit lying several hundred metres below the surface of the resort. The company has had a concession for mining it for years, while it applied for a confirmation of an annex to the plan for moving the mining establishment engaging in such activity. According to the Supreme Administrative Court, the opinion of the municipal executive authority, in whose opinion the change that the company applied for would violate the purpose of the property defined by the health resort status, was lawful. However, many arguments speak for the incorrectness of the assessment.
dc.contributor.affiliationUniwersytet Humanistyczno‑Przyrodniczy Jana Kochanowskiego
dc.contributor.authorAleksander Lipiński
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T16:28:30Z
dc.date.available2025-07-25T16:28:30Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.date.published12/2021
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.physical238–251
dc.description.volume13
dc.identifier.doi10.7206/kp.2080-1084.502
dc.identifier.issn2080-1084
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/2516
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofKrytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem
dc.relation.pages238–251
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.subjectplan ruchu zakładu górniczego
dc.subjectochrona uzdrowiskowa
dc.subjectzakazy prowadzenia działalności
dc.subtypeCommentary
dc.title

Glosa do wyroku NSA z dnia 20 lutego 2020 r., II GSK 3744/172

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication