Publikacja:

Publications in Scientific Journals – the New Face of Deception

Data

2022
Artykuł
Przeszukaj czasopismo Uproszczony widok Pełne metadane Statystyki
 
cris.legacyid7123
cris.virtual.journalance#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
cris.virtualsource.journalanceff6de15c-793d-460a-a16f-745170980ddb
dc.abstract.plThe review process of texts submitted for publication in scientific journals is one of the main ways of evaluating the scientific output of their authors. Any disruptions in this process can have serious and far-reaching consequences, not only in terms of the credibility and integrity of the author themselves, but – most importantly – in terms of the confidence in their achievements. Attempts to distort the review process have so far occurred most often in medical and exact sciences. The case of “The Critique of Law” discussed herein shows that attempts at scientific fraud affect also legal sciences. The purpose of the article is to inform the scientific community worldwide about subsequent attempts of unethical scholarly activities, to describe instances of malpractice, and to point out some of the possible ways to prevent the fraud in question.
dc.contributor.affiliationKozminski University
dc.contributor.authorMałgorzata Skórzewska-Amberg
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-25T16:29:33Z
dc.date.available2025-07-25T16:29:33Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.published12/2022
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.physical20-28
dc.description.volume14
dc.identifier.doi10.7206/kp.2080-1084.553
dc.identifier.issn2080-1084
dc.identifier.urihttps://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/2567
dc.languageen
dc.relation.ispartofKrytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem
dc.relation.pages20-28
dc.rightsCC-BY-4.0
dc.subjectscientific fraud
dc.subjectfake reviewer
dc.subjectfake review process
dc.subjectfake author
dc.subjectpaper mill
dc.subtypeOriginal
dc.title

Publications in Scientific Journals – the New Face of Deception

dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication