Publikacja:

Hyperion Commentary, Tamara Organizing: Reply to Krizanc

Data

2006
Artykuł
w:Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry
Przeglądaj czasopismo
Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry
Rocznik 2006Wydanie 3Numer 5
Przeglądaj numer
Ładowanie...
Miniatura

Pliki

Pobierz
Nazwa pliku 267-946-1-PB.pdf
Rozmiar:230.25 KB
Licencja
CC-BY-4.0

Autorzy

David Boje New Mexico State University

Czasopismo

Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry

Cytowanie

David Boje. (2006). Hyperion Commentary, Tamara Organizing: Reply to Krizanc. Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 5(3), 81–85. https://repozytorium.kozminski.edu.pl/handle/item/3109

Abstrakt

This is a reply to an essay that John Krizanc sent to me. Krizanc (1989) is also the author of the Tamara play. I have applied Tamara to organizing (Boje, 1995). Here I want to look at some of the consequences of interactive organizing that is theorized as a postmodern narrative. Producers and consumers meet in the narrative space we call 'organizing.' As Roland Barthes (1970) put it, “the goal of a literary work is to make the reader no longer a consumer but a producer of the text” (S/Z). In questioning the position of the narrative in relation to the producer and consumer of organizing, this essay challenges the role of consumer sovereignty that makes consumers the sole authors of organizing.

Statystyki

13 od daty umieszczenia 2025-07-25
1ostatni miesiąc
Data pozyskania: 2026-02-26
6 od daty umieszczenia 2025-07-25
Data pozyskania: 2026-02-26

Statystyki

13 od daty umieszczenia 2025-07-25
1ostatni miesiąc
Data pozyskania: 2026-02-26
6 od daty umieszczenia 2025-07-25
Data pozyskania: 2026-02-26